Showing posts with label GM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GM. Show all posts

Monday, April 9

French farmers challenge ban on GM maize

The entire debate about GM foods is now in fairly ridiculous territory. USA is merrily going about growing and using GM food. But here in Europe, its like its Frankenstein food. Which is also such a big reason why Europe is so much more expensive food wise and the poor end up spending more money on food. But then, never let it be said that the politicians can actually do something smart. They would prefer to ban GM food and say it benefits farmers. But here’s an interesting counterpoint. I quote

French maize growers and seed companies have appealed a ban on the cultivation of a strain of genetically modified maize to the country's highest court, saying it was unjustified and economically harmful for farmers.

France placed a temporary ban on the growth of Monsanto's MON810 GMO maize earlier this month after a previous moratorium was annulled by the country's top court in November on the basis that it was not sufficiently justified.

"This restriction does not rely on any serious scientific element, and maize producers, hit by [insects], sustain real financial damage," French growers group AGPM, French seed firms group UFS and the maize and sorghum producers federation FNPSMS said in a joint statement yesterday (29 March).

EU countries are able to restrict genetically modified crop cultivation under strict conditions asauthorisation licences are valid across the 27-country bloc, in accordance with the principles of the EU's single market.

Several member states have repeatedly invoked an EU safeguard clause enabling them to suspend the marketing or growth on their territory of GM crops that enjoy EU-wide authorisation, but the European Commission has never substantiated their applications and has always ordered the lifting of national bans.

France asked the European Commission in February to suspend authorization to sow the insect-resistant maize, the only GMO crop allowed for cultivation in the European Union.

The French government's request to the EU Commission was based on "significant risks for the environment" shown in recent scientific studies, it said.

Global agribusiness company Monsanto said its GMO maize is perfectly safe.

French and European farmers have expressed concerns about the consequences of EU consumers' hostility to GMOs, saying it is likely to make them fall behind in the competitive world grain market.

The safety assessments performed by the European Food Safety Authority have come under criticism over the years. The EU executive has tried to introduce practical changes to the EFSA'sGMO-approval process. 

Of course it will fall behind, it is already behind and my taxes are currently going to keep these more efficient agricultural practises out and inefficiency in. Bah

Tuesday, July 31

Adoption and Impact of Hybrid Wheat in India

You know something? on a near enough daily basis, i get emails about how Genetically Modified (GM) crops are going to create Frankenstein monsters, kill everybody and every species, put people in danger, etc. etc. etc. Reasoned arguments about GM seem to have gone down the same path as that of the Mac versus Wintel or the Israeli/Palestinian arguments. All those arguments are sound, just sound.

But here comes a peer reviewed journal article on adoption and the impact of hybrid wheat in India. The paper itself has a huge amount of references to other peer reviewed and serious research done in this area, so if there are others out there who are interested to learn more about hybrid technology and agriculture, you can do worse than to look at this paper.

Note, the paper does indicate that there has to be some regulatory/governmental function to manage the deployment of this technology. By all means, small farmers are not scaled up to take the benefits of new technology and since the vast majority of farmers in the world practise subsistence farming, one cannot rely on simply the market to protect them. Otherwise, the market mechanisms are simply too fast and the gap between a full stomach and starvation too small for a hands off regulatory system to work.

Ira Matuschke, Ritesh R. Mishra and Matin Qaim, Adoption and Impact of Hybrid Wheat in India, World Development, Volume 35, Issue 8, August 2007, Pages 1422-1435. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VC6-4NX2VYF-3/2/81e7df675fc3f526cfbe4ba706786ce0)
Abstract: Summary In the light of ongoing debates about the suitability of proprietary seed technologies for smallholder farmers, this paper analyzes the adoption and impact of hybrid wheat in India. Based on survey data, we show that farmers can benefit significantly from the proprietary technology. Neither farm size nor the subsistence level influences the adoption decision, but access to information and credit does. Moreover, willingness-to-pay analysis reveals that adoption levels would be higher if seed prices were reduced. Given decreasing public support to agricultural research, policies should be targeted at reducing institutional constraints, to ensure that resource-poor farmers are not bypassed by private sector innovations. Keywords: hybrid seeds; adoption; impact; IPRs; Asia; India