Showing posts with label investments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label investments. Show all posts

Thursday, May 14

I earn £55k a year. Can I afford private school for my son?

Kannu

Bit early for you to think about this level of details but my attention was caught by the fact that this fellow studied in oxford and has a similar background to you. He's 27 and has done fairly good financial planning but needs more advice. I can well see you facing similar situations in just 7-8 years with being married and possibly a child.

So I began thinking, if I had to advice you on how not to get into this situation or improve it, what can you do? Few things sprang to mind.

Think about getting married. And also see if your wife has the ability to earn some money part time. Whilst I'm fully for the mothers to look after the children full time, having two incomes really really helps. In this particular case, his problem would have been solved by having his wife work.

Second is to think whether you do need private schooling for your children. You two didn't need it but that means you need to stay in a location where there are good schools (comprehensive and grammar) which are free.

Which also means that you need to think about your mortgage. We will, of course, help you with your house or flat but we need to think about it. Earlier the better. I think you need to have a word with Mamma when you're down here so that we can work on your flat/house and location. Let's start looking.

You also need to max out your pension as much as you can buy we also need to think about paying off your uni debt as soon as possible.

And you know what impressed me reading about this chap? He is saving a seriously large amount of his earnings. That's very good. By my accounts he's saving almost 25-30% of his earnings which is most excellent. In the form of pensions and isa's. I learnt to do that well into my 30's but he's doing it since he's 25! You can start doing this even earlier if you can.

Lessons learnt son. Lessons learnt.

Love

Baba


I earn £55k a year. Can I afford private school for my son? - Telegraph
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/11408559/I-earn-55k-a-year.-Can-I-afford-private-school-for-my-son.html
(via Instapaper)


Money Makeover: Rik Thomas earns £55,000 and wants his young son to go to private school. Is it feasible? Katie Morley offers expert advice

At 16 months old, Rowan Thomas is only just starting to utter his first words.

But already his parents are thinking about how they are going to pay his private school fees.

His father, Rik Thomas, 27, says giving his son the best education possible is top priority – particularly for primary school – where he believes good teaching makes the biggest difference.

Friday, March 20

Does teaching about money actually help you become money wise?

First the abstract:

A large and growing literature documents that a large fraction of the population lacks of the basic skills to make sound financial decisions. This evidence has prompted a number of financial education initiatives around the world. These initiatives often take the form of education programs, but are rarely designed to be evaluated. A first urgent question is whether financial education is actually effective in enhancing the level of financial literacy. Using an evaluation design, our experiment studies the effect of financial education on financial literacy, investment attitudes and on how individuals perceive their level of financial literacy. To remove the effect of potentially important confounders, we run the same experiment in the field and in the laboratory. Our evidence shows a non-negligible effect on financial literacy and investment attitude, but an even larger effect on the degree of self-assessed financial literacy in the population of university students. The exercise thus uncovers an interesting pattern: financial education seems to improve more what individuals think to know than what individuals actually know. The results suggest that, while being able to increase financial literacy, financial education programs can also cause individuals to become more confident in their abilities without actually being more equipped to face financial decisions. Our results imply an important warning on the effectiveness of financial education initiatives. The increase in self-confidence seems to be a necessary by-product of financial education. An extremely polluting by-product, if the increase in self-confidence is not matched by the improvement in actual skills.

Financial literacy has been a bit of a bug bear for me for many moons now. I have taught my son on how to look after money and investments along with some friends. Helped develop a trading game for the London School of Economics which deployed to many many schools over many years to help the kids learn about finance and moneys. Helped all the families in another charity that I look after with learning about debt and money. And in my own teaching as part of STEM Ambassadorship, I talk about money to school students. But this is a fascinating result, that its not just enough to tell them what to do, this telling and teaching doesn't seem to be reflecting in actual money handling skills.

Much to think about now, but at least they are conscious of money. Something that we just do not do enough of.

Thursday, October 23

Recession or no recession, many NFL, NBA and Major League

Kids

Both of you have investments and thankfully have got the savings bug. That's very good discipline. I've seen poverty closely kids and it's not fun at all. Not at all. Specially when you're old. That's the worst part kids because you cannot make money at that time and have to rely on people's handouts. 

It's soul destroying to ask for money. I've seen your grandparents in extremely difficult circumstances as far as money is concerned kids. Never ever allow yourself to get into that situation. 

You may have lots of money kids. You may invent something big. Or one of your lottery tickets comes true. Or an investment pays off. But always be grounded. 

See the story of these athletes. They are like flashes in the pan kids. They earned loads and then whoosh. All was gone. 

Read and learn. And remember the rule kids, save 1/3rd of your money. Every month. As much as possible. 

Love

Baba

Recession or no recession, many NFL, NBA and Major League - 03.23.09 - SI Vault
http://cnnsi.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&expire=&fb=Y&partnerID=289881&title=Recession+or+no+recession%2C+many+NFL%2C+NBA+and+Major+League+-+03.23.09+-+SI+Vault&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsportsillustrated.cnn.com%2Fvault%2Farticle%2Fmagazine%2FMAG1153364%2Findex.htm&urlID=34813453


What the hell happened here? Seven floors above the iced-over Dallas North Tollway, Raghib (Rocket) Ismail is revisiting the question. It's December, and Ismail is sitting in the boardroom of Chapwood Investments, a wealth management firm, his white Notre Dame snow hat pulled down to his furrowed brow.

Wednesday, January 8

how to pick small cap shares

Kannu

Here's an excellent overview of how to pick small company shares. And the best part is that this applies for large companies as well. But if you want, you can always invest in funds which invest in small caps. All the elements in here are what you will do in your own business, look after the details, check the board and management, look for a good track record, don’t invest in something that you don’t understand etc. etc. Very nice and basic information that so many people don’t follow, son. If you want to become a banker, then this is also very useful information. And the reason why this is so straightforward and popular is that this is common sense.

You can print this off and keep it as a checklist when evaluating companies, absolutely worthwhile

Love

baba

How to pick small-cap shares

By John Lee

Small-cap shares tend to outperform the broader market significantly over longer periods, even allowing for their greater volatility, and have turned in particularly notable performances since the worst of the financial crisis passed.

They are less well covered by analysts and the media, so the chances of finding an undervalued nugget are high for those prepared to do the legwork. In addition, small-caps can grow faster from a lower base than their larger rivals.

John Lee was one of Britain’s first “Isa millionaires”, and made much of his fortune (now over £3m) via judicious investment in smaller company shares. His book How to Make a Million – Slowly, is published by Pearson Education next week.

-------------------------------------------

Friday, May 3

Olivier Blanchard’s Five Lessons for Economists From the Financial Crisis

I take no pleasure in being prescient but one of the reasons we are ahead is because I lived thorough 3 recessions now. Son what goes up must come down. Details matter. Value investing is always going to win out. There are no silver bullets in investing returns. Find undervalued companies and invest. Look for good growth stories and good management. You read the intelligent investor. 

Still as an economics student this article is worth reading son. The plumbing matters. The connections, the pipe width, the material, the angles all matter in the financial and economic world. And you can never be 100% right. 

What people don't understand is that they don't understand what the future of the economy and financial system will be. So when people don't understand what's happening they react in bad ways. Go pray to god. Or bite people's heads off like the reaction against bankers. Or throw more laws. Like more laws against rape are supposed to lead to less rape. The thinking goes like this. 

We have a problem. So something must be done. This is something. Thus this must be done. 

Weird ass thinking son. 

Love

Baba

Olivier Blanchard’s Five Lessons for Economists From the Financial Crisis - Real Time Economics - WSJ
http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2013/04/01/olivier-blanchards-five-lessons-for-economists-from-the-financial-crisis/


What did the worst financial crisis and deepest recession in 75 years teach academic economists and policymakers on whose watch it happened? At a recent London School of Economics forum, convened to honor Bank of England Governor Mervyn King,Olivier Blanchard offered some answers.

Getty Images
Olivier Blanchard

Mr. Blanchard, 64 years old, is well positioned to offer such reconsideration. An internationally prominent macroeconomist, he spent 25 years on the MIT faculty before becoming chief economist at the International Monetary Fund in September 2008, just before the collapse of Lehman Brothers.

Here are Mr. Blanchard¹s five lessons in his own words, lightly edited by The Wall Street Journal’s David Wessel:

#1: Humility is in order.

The Great Moderation [the economically tranquil period from 1987 to 2007] convinced too many of us that the large-economy crisis -­ a financial crisis, a banking crisis ­- was a thing of the past. It wasn’t going to happen again, except maybe in emerging markets. History was marching on.

My generation, which was born after World War II, lived with the notion that the world was getting to be a better and better place. We knew how to do things better, not only in economics but in other fields as well. What we have learned is that¹s not true. History repeats itself. We should have known.

Tuesday, April 23

What’s in a name? actually quite a lot

Shakespeare said…

Juliet:
"What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet."

Romeo and Juliet (II, ii, 1-2)

But poor man was living in a different world, nowadays, the name of the company has a big impact on its performance. See this paper.

Research from psychology suggests that people evaluate fluent stimuli more favorably than similar information that is harder to process. Consistent with fluency affecting investment decisions, we find that companies with short, easy to pronounce names have higher breadth of ownership, greater share turnover, lower transaction price impacts, and higher valuation ratios. Corporate name changes increase fluency on average, and fluency-improving name changes are associated with increases in breadth of ownership, liquidity, and firm value. Name fluency also affects other investment decisions, with fluently named closed-end funds trading at smaller discounts and fluent mutual funds attracting greater fund flows.

An example that they quote is:

Practically speaking, when choosing from among drug manufacturers, people could instinctively feel more comfortable investing in a name such as “Forest Laboratories” than the less fluent “Allergan Ligand Retinoid Therapeutics.”

Hmmm, i wonder what that will mean to the financial institutions that i know and love? lol

Thursday, March 21

Buy India, Sell China

Kannu

You were asking if its good to sell the xtrata and rio and buy virgin. My answer was ambiguous. What you need to think about is what's the best stock or fund to purchase which will give you the best return over the coming say 1 year. So you have to do some analysis. What's the projected return from virgin media? Versus say an Italian or Indian fund? Or say the ft 100 or 250 fund? Or an oil firm? Etc etc? Did you do a comparison? 

Love

Baba

Buy India, Sell China - Forbes
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesgruber/2013/03/09/buy-india-sell-china/


Until recently, India saw itself as an emerging economic powerhouse, the next China so to speak. Those delusions of grandeur led to complacency and the end-result is that GDP growth has slumped to a ten-year low. Most investors are now writing India off as an economic and political basket case. For Asia Confidential,that spells potential opportunity. While India has many problems, they’re unlikely to get much worse from here. At 13x forward earnings, with a cyclically low earnings base, the India market looks reasonable value.

India’s rival, China, has far bigger problems, in my view. Current consensus suggests China’s economy is recovering, its politicians will ensure this continues and stocks are poised to rebound. I think this will prove very wrong. To prevent a steep economic decline in the middle of last year, China’s politicians effectively doubled down on the investment driven, debt fuelled growth strategy which got the country into trouble in the first place. That’s led to spiralling asset bubbles and this week’s news of likely further monetary tightening confirms the government is worried. It should be.

Two weeks ago, I recommended that investors sell Chinese stocks, after suggesting to buy them in October last year (and realising a nice gain). Today, I’ll outline why Indian stocks offer better prospects over the next 2-3 years.

Monday, March 26

Will you trust your colleague’s views on investments?

Fascinating article. I quote the abstract

To what extent conflicts of interest affect the investment value of sell-side analyst research is an ongoing debate. We approach this issue from a new direction by investigating how asset-management divisions of investment banks use stock recommendations issued by their own analysts. Based on holdings changes around initiations, upgrades, and downgrades from 1993 to 2003, we find that these bank-affiliated investors follow recommendations from sell-side analysts in general, increasing (decreasing) their relative holdings following positive (negative) recommendations. More importantly, these investors respond more strongly to recommendations issued by their own analysts than to those issued by analysts affiliated with other banks, especially for recommendations on small and low-analyst-coverage firms. Thus, we find that investment banks “eat their own cooking,” showing that these presumably sophisticated institutional investors view sell-side recommendations as having investment value, particularly when the recommendations come from their own analysts.

Once upon a time, I was quite taken by investment banking research reports. Used to invest based upon what a bank would say. But now that I am a bit more wiser after making some real duds, I observe these research analysis with a far more jaundiced eye, and rely on my investments with my own research and views. Only myself to blame when I invest in duds but at least I’m not being stupid to follow research which can and is frequently biased for a variety of reasons.

But this article is interesting from a different perspective. Looks like the asset management arms of these banks tend to rely more on their colleagues across the Chinese walls. Hmmm, so before you select a fund, make sure that you check whether the owner has an investment bank and what kind of analysts do they have..

Thursday, December 8

Avoid these three money mistakes

Dear Son
quite an interesting article, on investing mistakes that the chap made. Pretty straightforward but worth following.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162-57324728/avoid-these-three-money-mistakes/?tag=nl.e713
MoneyWatch) Financial planner and New York Times blogger Carl Richards created a stir when he wrote How A Financial Pro Lost His House earlier this month. It was a gut wrenching true story of how he got caught up in the real estate bubble in Las Vegas and eventually lost his home via a short sale after the meltdown. It created quite the controversy in the financial planning community as planners debated whether he did a service to the public or hurt the reputation of the financial planning industry. I come down on the side that he did the right and courageous thing, since his willingness to share his experience gives us all the opportunity to learn from our mistakes. I've written about some of my blunders before and have to tell you that this pro had no trouble coming up with my biggest three money mistakes. So I'll match my friend Carl and raise him by two blunders.


Gold was going to make me rich


I bought gold in the last gold bubble back in 1979 with the college graduation money I received from my parents. I've written about this blunder before, noting I was sure I was going to be rich. Fast forward 32 years and I haven't even kept up with inflation. Had I put that graduation money in the stock market, it would be worth ten times the amount the gold is worth today.
My only excuse was that, back in 1979, behavioral finance hadn't yet been invented and I didn't realize I was merely following the herd. In hindsight, I came to consider this my best investment ever. Certainly not because it was all that lucrative, but rather because it taught a freshly minted college graduate who was ready to take on the world that he wasn't as smart as he thought. Further, it was the defining event that made me into the indexer I am today.

I bought way too much house

Though Carl may have lost his house, I bought too much house. My wife and I left Aspen, Colorado in 2000 and moved to Colorado Springs. While the two are only 100 miles apart geographically, housing prices could not have been more different. Houses were less than a tenth of the price of glitzy Aspen and utilities were dirt cheap at the time.
I made the classic mistake of buying an enormous 6,000 square foot house with 20 foot ceilings for a family of three. I'd love to blame it on my wife, but the truth is that I was the one who fell in love with the house and drove the decision to buy it. Today, we are spending a fortune on utilities and maintenance for a house we would be lucky to fetch what we paid for it 11 years ago. The short-term pleasure I felt from owning the big house with the great view has long since passed. Anyone know where I could get a good price on replacing a rotting deck?
The lesson I learned is that even real estate is a risky investment and the cost of maintaining it takes away from the pleasure of having a lot of space with a great view. I underestimated the value of simplicity and now, with our son less than five years from heading off to college, wish we had chosen to buy a small tract home with maintenance provided by a homeowner's association.

I bought stuff rather than experiences

Ever since I was a kid I remember that if I spent money on something like a movie or a concert, it would soon be over and I'd have nothing to show for it except a memory. On the other hand, if I bought tangible stuff, I'd have it forever and be able to always enjoy it. It turns out that my logic was all wrong.
Life is about being happy and satisfied and all of the research shows that experiences have a far bigger impact on happiness than stuff. For a long time, I focused on the price tag and tended to skimp while on vacations or when attending a ball game or theater. I mean, it's the same game or play regardless of where you're sitting, right?
Today, I'm loosening up and starting to splurge a bit with some seats near the 50 yard line and having the family swim with the dolphins in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. The latter is a memory all three of us will cherish for a long time and discuss fondly.
This last mistake is something that will take me a long time to improve on. I'm pre-progammed to accumulate money, which happens to make it difficult for me to actually spend it. Money is stored energy and I'm having a hard time using some of that energy I've worked so hard to accumulate. Yet I know I can't be buried with it.
Embrace your mistakes
If you think being a financial professional means you don't make money mistakes, think again. I applaud Carl Richards for being so upfront about how he lost his house and I have a long list of destructive money behaviors that often get the better of me.
It's easy to celebrate what we do right and even easier to blame others when something goes wrong. It's a lot harder to embrace mistakes, talk about them openly, and make changes going forward.
Warren Buffett is the world's most successful living investor and he seems to have no issues discussing his biggest blunders. Perhaps he is such a great investor because he owned up to and learned from his mistakes. If your financial pro has trouble coming up with his money mistakes, you may want to be be a bit concerned.

You do need to have a house always. A place to stay. Of course, you will always have a place to stay with us, son, but that's not really something that you might want to think as your permanent place of residence as you will have your wife and kids and and and. But you shouldn't speculate that much on houses, don't buy too big a house as then you have to maintain it and and and. Also remember, its for you to live in, not to show off to others. The day the others pay your bills, you can show off to them, but till then, tell them to bog off. Remember that Warren Buffet lives in a tiny house despite him being able to buy millions of them…

Gold is another interesting investment son, one should have some gold in hand in terms of the ultimate security, but to speculate on it? hmmm, not sure…And well, buying experiences is much better than stuff.

Tuesday, November 15

81 Reasons We Love Warren Buffett

Dear Son
First of all, I hope you do well in your Math exam today, I am sure you will ace it as usual.
I am sure you will appreciate this article. there are quite a lot of reasons to love and admire old Warren but you cant go wrong with following him really. He has made quite a lot of money by following good tactics and strategy. That makes sense.
But you have to remember to sweat the small details, son, review your portfolio every week minimum. If you are not reviewing your portfolio every week, it basically means that you arent interested in your money. Now why would you not be interested in that? If its important, review it, sweat it and take decisions. And reviewing doesnt mean taking a cursory look at it, it means that you ask if you are happy for your money to be in that person's hands for the foreseeable future or not. So every week you have to make a decision.
Get that discipline into you, son, that will help you tremendously.
Love you
Baba


81 Reasons We Love Warren Buffett - 31/08/2011
http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/2011/08/31/81-reasons-we-love-warren-buffett.aspx?source=uoofolrf0010002


Published in Investing on 31 August 2011

3 comments

A version of this article was originally published on our US site, Fool.com.

Yesterday was Warren Buffett’s 81st birthday. To celebrate, here are 81 reasons that make him the Fool’s biggest hero.

1. Intricate, occasionally contradictory complexity hides beneath the aw-shucks folksy charm. As a Forbes writer once put it, “Buffett is not a simple person, but he has simple tastes.”

2. Many people talk about avoiding the madding crowd, but Buffett actually does it by living 1,250 miles away from Wall Street.

3. He has a fortress-like internal scorecard on all things investing, but a vulnerable, endearing external scorecard on many aspects of his personal life. See his penchant for seeking mother figures.

4. Perspective: “In the 20th century, the United States endured two world wars and other traumatic and expensive military conflicts; the Depression; a dozen or so recessions and financial panics; oil shocks; a flu epidemic; and the resignation of a disgraced president. Yet the Dow rose from 66 to 11,497.”

5. He is that guy in school who tells you he may have failed the test … only to bust the top of the curve.

6. His time frame for the long run consistently exceeds his life span.

7. Him saying it better: “Someone’s sitting in the shade today because someone planted a tree a long time ago.”

8. He’s human. He fears nuclear war and his own mortality. He’s frequently more adept at business relationships than personal ones. He can hold a grudge. His hero is his daddy.

9. Classic line: “Rule No.1: Never lose money. Rule No.2: Never forget rule No.1.”

10. Once branded a stingy miser (rightly or wrongly), Buffett has evolved (assuming it wasn’t his intention from the start) into one of the most effective philanthropists I know. After growing his potential givings at a 20% compounded rate per year, he set a plan to give most of it away.

11. Perhaps as importantly, he put ego aside and outsourced the charitable decision making to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Circle of competence at its finest.

12. “I never attempt to make money on the stock market. I buy on the assumption that they could close the market the next day and not reopen it for five years.” Contrast that with computer algorithm-based trading, day trading, and some of the moves you’ve made in your own account.

13. Buffett’s smarter than you and I, but he’s kind enough to let us feel otherwise.

14. David Sokol was once an heir apparent and arguably Buffett’s most trusted operations guy. But when Sokolgate erupted, Buffett stayed true to his word: “We can afford to lose money — even a lot of money. But we can’t afford to lose reputation — even a shred of reputation.”

15. “Derivatives are financial weapons of mass destruction.” He said it early, and we are reminded of it often.

16. In a glimpse of the nuance that some commentators call hypocrisy, Buffett uses derivatives himself. But he does so in a way that doesn’t threaten the entire financial system and explains why in his annual shareholder letters.

17. He doomed himself from ever holding public office: “A public-opinion poll is no substitute for thought.”

18. I like juxtaposing these two quotes: (1) “It’s better to hang out with people better than you. Pick out associates whose behavior is better than yours and you’ll drift in that direction.” (2) “Wall Street is the only place that people ride to in a Rolls-Royce to get advice from those who take the subway.”

19. “You only have to do a very few things right in your life so long as you don’t do too many things wrong.”

20. He has the ability to resist the allure of the quick fix or quick buck when longer-term dynamics are at play.

21. Not sure if this quote was before or after the Internet: “Let blockheads read what blockheads wrote.”

22. For those hoping to become famous and respected, he’s a testament that the challenges and doubts keep coming regardless of the length of the track record. He’s publicly prevailed so far.

23. An investing truism: “Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.”

24. The business side of that investing truism: “Your premium brand had better be delivering something special, or it’s not going to get the business.”

25. He uses colourful language and analogies when drab jargon could do the trick.

26. Boring example: moat vs. competitive advantage.

27. Not-so-boring example: sex.

28. “Look at market fluctuations as your friend rather than your enemy; profit from folly rather than participate in it.”

29. Classic line: “Only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked.”

30. He backs up his saying, “Our favourite holding period is forever,” by keeping past-their-prime subsidiaries others would “spin off to unlock value.”

31. His Robin (Charlie Munger) can kick your Batman’s butt.

32. He makes loophole-free handshake deals.

33. “Risk comes from not knowing what you’re doing.”

34. Keep it simple, stupid, quote No. 1: “The business schools reward difficult complex behaviour more than simple behaviour, but simple behaviour is more effective.”

35. Keep it simple, stupid, quote No. 2: “There seems to be some perverse human characteristic that likes to make easy things difficult.”

36. The Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-B.US) annual meeting is an unrivaled spectacle in investing, truly living up to its billing as the Woodstock for Capitalists.

37. One of the most succinct summations of why America is great: “There are 309 million people out there that are trying to improve their lot in life. And we’ve got a system that allows them to do it.”

38. Trash-bin-diving caution No. 1: “It’s far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.”

39. Trash-bin-diving caution No. 2: “Time is the friend of the wonderful company, the enemy of the mediocre.”

40. He’s an eternal optimist in a sound-bite culture that often rewards pessimists.

41. His shareholder letters reveal an artisan-like craftsmanship only seen when the proprietor cares deeply about his creation.

42. The contrarian credo: “We simply attempt to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful.”

43. Genius fails: “When a management with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a reputation for bad economics, it is the reputation of the business that remains intact.”

44. Like so many great thinkers, Buffett is able to ignore noise and whittle a decision down to its core variables. After he explains those variables, the decision sounds elementary.

45. Why banking can be dangerous: “When you combine ignorance and leverage, you get some pretty interesting results.”

46. He allows me to see the word “Buffett” without thinking of Jimmy.

47. Buffett maintains a high thought-to-speech ratio.

48. Buffett’s librarian fantasy: “If past history was all there was to the game, the richest people would be librarians.”

49. He converts a deadly sin into a virtue: “You do things when the opportunities come along. I’ve had periods in my life when I’ve had a bundle of ideas come along, and I’ve had long dry spells. If I get an idea next week, I’ll do something. If not, I won’t do a damn thing.”

50. Averaging 20% returns for almost half a century results in beating the S&P 500 78:1!

51. Even as he has fewer and fewer meaningful investing options because of the size of Berkshire Hathaway, he continues to wow us.

52. On a chili-dog-and-onion-ring-flavoured note, Berkshire Hathaway owns Dairy Queen, my favorite fast-food chain.

53. Many of Buffett’s managers were wildly successful entrepreneurs before selling out to Berkshire. Convincing successful, often headstrong, boss-less superstars to voluntarily subjugate themselves and to keep those people motivated and happy is a feat.

54. On a related note, Buffett doesn’t micromanage. Good thing, with an empire this large.

55. He gets doubted again and again and again and proves the doubters wrong most of the time. Yet, you never hear him say “I told you so.”

56. Well, maybe sometimes he gloats. Harvard Business School rejected him, which led him to study under his mentors Benjamin Graham and David Dodd at Columbia. His “how do you like me now?” statement: “Harvard did me a big favor by turning me down,” he said. “But I haven’t made any contributions to them in thanks for that.”

57. He has become America’s de facto investing teacher. And he’s done so willingly.

58. Perhaps my favourite Buffett line: “We like things that you don’t have to carry out to three decimal places. If you have to carry them out to three decimal places, they’re not good ideas.”

59. Not that he can’t be ruthless, but Buffett tends to look for win-win situations where possible. Contrast that with the Wall Street art of “ripping the face off” of clients.

60. He’s often described as a “learning machine,” extending his natural abilities and allowing him to make behemoth investing decisions over the span of just hours.

61. He added to Ben Graham’s teachings with the help of that learning-machine ability and Munger’s counsel.

62. Here’s a good place to point out that available-to-all company annual reports are the primary fuel in his learning machine. He reads them voraciously to compare and contrast companies and build his business knowledge base. See the next point.

63. When asked what the most important key to his success was, Buffett answered, “focus.” His biographer Alice Schroeder elaborates: He has “focus like you have never seen on anybody else.” For good or ill, Buffett’s entire life has been dedicated to investing. It’s much harder than he lets on.

64. Plenty of business fish in the sea: “There are all kinds of businesses that I don’t understand, but that doesn’t cause me to stay up at night. It just means I go on to the next one, and that’s what the individual investor should do.”

65. How many people can pull off being a contrarian by buying shares of Coca-Cola?

66. Even with an investing world full of Buffett students and imitators, he manages to surprise.

67. He takes every legal, ethical advantage available in the current system, but lobbies for a better system. For example, he supports higher taxes for the rich, more severe estate taxes, and a level playing field. As he puts it, “I don’t like anything where the bottom 20% keep getting a poorer and poorer deal.”

68. He is grateful for the advantages he has had in life — as many of us have, he won the “ovarian lottery.”

69. When he talks, E.F. Hutton listens.

70. Like many geniuses, he is frequently the confounding exception to the rule. For example, “not a dime of cash has left Berkshire for dividends or share repurchases during the past 40 years.” And we shareholders thank him for it.

71. Buffett buys what he knows (and frequently loves), but he doesn’t overpay out of affection. He has the discipline to wait decades for the right opportunity.

72. He gives credit to his direct reports.

73. Not only is Buffett a great investor and manager, he’s one hell of a writer. My jealousy grows.

74. He once picked up a date in a hearse he co-owned.

75. Before having his money work for him, he worked for his money early on with a series of jobs, schemes, and ventures. These included a paper route, selling chewing gum door-to-door, a pinball business, a sales job at J.C. Penney’s, caddying, marking up refurbished golf balls, and founding a horse-racing tip sheet.

76. It’s very possible the house you live in is worth more than the house Buffett lives in — the house in Omaha he bought in 1958.

77. Over the years, he has relied on a similar set of answers to oft-asked questions. That his philosophy has stayed stable throughout that time is remarkable.

78. His wealth has bought him the ultimate trophy: He does whatever he wants to do just about every single day.

79. He’s the outsized calming influence a lot of us need. From his biography Snowball: “If a tornado were barreling straight toward Kiewit Plaza [where his office is], Buffett would say that things were ‘never better’ before mentioning the twister.”

80. Anyone who can make the hyper-opinionated Charlie Munger regularly utter “I have nothing to add” must be saying something impressive.

81. He fully expects this list to one day reach well into the triple digits. And I look forward to adding those lines. Happy birthday, Mr. Buffett!

Monday, October 24

My investor personality test

Dear Son

One of the key things to being an investor is to know your own mind and what makes you tick. Its only when you have figured out what you are and what makes you tick, that you can be a better investor. You realise what are your failings and how to protect yourself from mistakes you make because of you. One way is to ask the women in your life (at least for me, the women in my life are ever ready and have a very long list of problems they have with me), another way is to do surveys. Here’s an example of one which I did, try it out here. My results if you wanted to compare, are here:

Investor Personality Test

Very High

PERSONALITY FACTORS

Conscientiousness : Very High

Emotionality : Very Low

Extraversion : Very High

Openness : Very High

Agreeableness : High

BIAS REPORT

Confidence Biases

Overconfidence : High

Over-Optimism : High

Risk-taking Biases

Risk Aversion : Very Low

Emotional Vulnerability : Very Low

Cutting winners short : Below Average

Impulse-control

Self-discipline : Very High

Immediate Gratification : Below Average

Excitement-seeking : High

Intellectualism

Intellectualism : Very High

Herding

Trend-following : Very High

Just plonking in one of the detailed reports, rest are boring.

Conscientiousness

Conscientiousness Factor: Your result is Very High.

  • Conscientiousness describes your relative ability to plan and organize towards achieving goals and to exercise self-control.
  • You scored in the HIGH range for conscientiousness. Intelligent activity involves contemplation of long-range goals, organizing and planning routes to these goals, and persisting toward one's goals in the face of short-lived impulses to the contrary. You can achieve high levels of success through purposeful planning and persistence. You are likely to be positively regarded by others as intelligent and reliable. On the down side, some people may see you as rigid or perfectionistic.

Emotionality

Emotionality Factor: Your result is Very Low.

  • Emotionality is characterized by stress-sensitivity and more frequent experiences of negative emotions than others.
  • You scored in the LOW range on emotionality. You are relatively more calm, emotionally stable, and free from persistent negative feelings when compared to high scorers. Freedom from negative feelings does not mean that you experience more positive feelings. You may be reckless in dangerous situations and take more risks than others (sometimes without knowing that you are doing so). In general you are probably secure, hardy, and relaxed even under stressful conditions.

Extraversion

Extraversion Factor: Your result is Very High.

  • Extraversion is characterized by a desire to socialize and a tendency to optimism. Extraverts derive energy from interactions with others, while introverts' interests are fueled by introspection.
  • You scored in the HIGH range on extraversion. You probably enjoy being with people, are full of energy, and often experience positive emotions. In groups you are likely to talk, assert yourself, and draw attention. In general you are outgoing, active, and joyful.

Openness

Openness Factor: Your result is Very High.

  • Openness to new experiences describes a willingness to experiment with tradition, to seek out new experiences, and to think broadly and abstractly.
  • You scored in the HIGH range on openness. You are intellectually curious and tend to be, compared to closed people, more aware of your feelings. You probably tend to think and act in individualistic and nonconforming ways. Open and closed styles of thinking are useful in different environments. An open intellectual style may serve you well as a psychologist, professor or investor. Research has shown that closed thinking is related to superior job performance in police work, sales, service occupations, and short-term trading.

Agreeableness

Agreeableness Factor: Your result is High.

  • Agreeableness reflects a concern with cooperation and social harmony.
  • You scored HIGH in the range for Agreeableness. You generally value getting along with others. You are therefore more likely to be considerate, helpful, and willing to compromise. You are also likely to believe that people are basically decent and trustworthy. On the downside, agreeableness can be a handicap when making tough or rapid independent decisions. Agreeableness creates an aura of likability and often leads to popularity, and thus is common among managers.

Wednesday, October 19

in the long run, we are all dead

That's the famous saying from Keynes, Son, but this is an interesting perspective on long run investing. I like this idea because it forces you to think like an investor. A business person. One shouldn't get excited about short term results or returns because ups and downs will happen.

Think about it in a different way, if you were running a business of say making widgets, will you stop and sell the company if there were no sales in one day? or in a month? no, you will keep on persevering and investing and running it. Same thing here. Good companies will last. Obviously if they are tanking, then you must sell them, but good companies will definitely last. The current valuations are extraordinarily low. If I take the FTSE 100 stocks, which are perhaps comprising of one of the most liquid international stocks in the world, then these are the companies whose PE ratio's are below 10. When the long run average of US stocks is ar 15-16, then these are significantly undervalued. Now here's my question and something that you have already answered by your investments, these firms are good firms, they have good assets, they have a fairly good yield, good prospects, good management and still their valuations suck. So its a good time to invest.

Remember, the time to invest is when people are selling....

 

Lloyds Banking Group £22,281.17 £43,467 £369 £46,902 0.00% -0.50p n/a
BP £80,683.62 $297,107 -$9,140 $95,891 1.04% -19.81¢ n/a
Cairn Energy £4,088.08 n/a -$299 $3,838 0.00% -19.17¢ n/a
Resolution Ltd. £3,804.46 £1,288 £1,083 £6,549 6.61% 81.10p 3
Kazakhmys £4,664.59 $3,237 $1,098 $8,219 1.60% 259.00¢ 5
Barclays £21,502.95 £32,204 £5,926 £62,262 3.12% 30.40p 6
Eurasian Natural Resources Corp. £8,389.69 $6,605 $2,710 $10,033 2.97% 170.00¢ 6
Aviva £9,735.98 £36,274 £3,966 £17,725 7.50% 55.10p 6
Old Mutual £6,015.41 £3,582 £3,926 £11,474 3.68% 16.00p 7
BAE Systems £9,338.63 £21,097 £1,505 £5,403 6.19% 40.80p 7
AstraZeneca £39,415.56 $33,269 $11,494 $23,410 5.44% 671.00¢ 7
Vedanta Resources £3,204.93 $11,427 $2,534 $13,679 2.76% 262.80¢ 7
Rio Tinto £48,158.80 $56,576 $19,694 $65,274 2.07% 713.30¢ 7
Legal & General Group £6,135.87 £5,348 £1,475 £4,874 4.55% 14.07p 7
BHP Billiton £40,340.57 $71,739 $31,816 $57,755 3.35% 393.50¢ 8
Xstrata £27,799.79 $30,499 $7,102 $42,021 1.67% 177.00¢ 9
Investec £1,989.07 £2,013 £410 £3,961 4.64% 43.20p 9
BT Group £14,078.21 £20,076 £2,578 £1,951 4.09% 21.00p 9
Anglo American £30,487.82 $27,960 $10,245 $37,971 1.79% 413.00¢ 9
International Consolidated Airlines Group SA £3,031.67 £6,683 £342 £2,400 0.00% 18.05p 9
Man Group £3,032.30 $1,655 $305 $4,436 8.68% 28.00¢ 9
GKN £2,955.62 £5,084 £385 £1,687 2.63% 20.70p 9
Marks & Spencer Group £5,309.30 £9,740 £837 £2,677 5.08% 34.80p 10
ITV £2,426.82 £2,064 £364 £663 0.00% 6.40p 10

 

Stocks For The Long, Long Run By
Morgan Housel
http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/2011/10/18/stocks-for-the-long-long-run.aspx?source=uoofolrf0010002
Inside the mind of Jeremy Siegel.
A version of this article originally appeared on our US site, Fool.com.
"Oh, you're meeting with Jeremy Siegel tomorrow? Lucky you," a professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School told me. "You'll leave feeling much better about your investments than when you entered," he said with a laugh and a hint of sarcasm.
This is the Jeremy Siegel -- Wharton's famed finance professor -- the public has come to know: A perennially bullish academic who was born an optimist and never looked back, leading to criticism that he's more stock market cheerleader than rational analyst.
But after meeting with Siegel at a conference at Wharton in Philadelphia this week, I left with a different view. He is perhaps as bullish on the stock market as he's ever been. "The pessimism these days is just striking," he notes. And some of his arguments are still as controversial, if not logically curious, as ever. But agree with him or not, Jeremy Siegel's view on the stock market is fascinating. There's a reason people still pay attention to him.
Siegel is quick to note that being characterized as a permabull is undeserved. "People ask me, 'Jeremy, why are you always so bullish?' Well, I'm not. I wasn't bullish on stocks in 2000," he says. And he's right: In March 2000, Siegel penned an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal warning that technology stocks were grossly overvalued.
But it's his book, Stocks for the Long Run, that people remember. First published in 1994 and now in its fourth edition, the book has sold hundreds of thousands of copies. Its message is clear: Over time, stocks outperform all other assets classes. They are, definitively, the greatest wealth-generating machine that investors can get their hands on. Hitting the shelves just as one of the largest bull markets in history was heating up, the book served as a bible during the 1990s for investors anchored to the idea that stocks could go only one way -- up. After stocks crashed and then languished for the past decade, Siegel has been the butt of all kinds of criticism. As markets bottomed in early 2009, Business Insider wrote, "No, the charming Wharton professor isn't dead. But he may just have killed what's left of his reputation." It continued: Siegel "has been very bullish, and very wrong, for the past two years."
But perpetual bullishness isn't what Siegel preaches. Most of those criticizing his bullishness ignore the title of his book. He isn't just bullish on stocks; he's bullish on stocks in the long run. I'd even qualify that: Siegel is bullish on stocks in the long, long run.
A group of financial writers had been at Wharton for four days, listening to lectures on behavioural finance, outsourcing, and accounting fraud. Siegel's presentation had a feel different from all others. He isn't just a professor presenting his research. He's a seasoned (he's been a professor for 40 years) financial philosopher meets historian meets talented showman. The last part is perhaps Siegel's most underappreciated strength. The man is far more charismatic than you might think. When presenting otherwise dry data on historic investment returns, Siegel drops his voice to a whisper and then booms into a punch line for dramatic effect.
It's that data that underscores Siegel's view of the market. In the late 1980s, then a monetary policy economist, he began collecting historic returns on stocks, bonds, cash, and gold going back to 1802. It's the most complete set of historic investment returns available, he points out.
What the data show is crystal clear. One dollar invested in stocks in 1802 would be worth more than $700,000 today, adjusted for inflation. The same dollar in bonds would be worth less than $1,500. In gold, it's about $4. In a dollar kept under your mattress, it's $0.05. Over two centuries, there is no substitute to stocks.
Which would be an open-and-shut finding if we were Methuselah, and had 200 years to save. Unfortunately, we don't. And within that 200 years of data sits an uncountable number of chaotic swings, with stocks moving from wild bull markets to crushing bear markets -- even a 90% collapse during the Great Depression. Over some periods, stocks dramatically underperform bonds, gold, and cash. That holds true for the past 10 years, as investors know all too well.
But it's at this point -- the point where so many become skeptical of Siegel -- where his work becomes the most persuasive. Comparing risk between stocks and bonds, the opposite of what most assume is true emerges when measured over long periods of time.
Modern finance theory holds that stocks should return more than bonds because they're riskier. What Siegel's data show, however, is that this risk diminishes, even flips upside down, when you hold an asset long enough. Since 1802, average stock volatility is much higher than for bonds when looking at one-, two-, or five-year periods. But then it flips. When held for 10 years, average real stock returns become less risky than bonds. Over 20-year and 30-year periods, there's no comparison: The upside potential is far greater for stocks, and even the worst periods generate positive real returns, while the worst period for bonds leaves investors with substantial real losses. "Even when looking at periods that ended in the bottom of the Great Depression, stocks had a positive real return if held for 20 years," Siegel said. "You have never lost money in stocks over any 20-year period, but you have wiped out half your portfolio in bonds. So which is the riskier asset?" he asks, his voice now booming. "And nothing that's happened over the past 10 years negates this data." Nor are these unreasonable periods of time. Twenty or 30 years is about the average time between when people start saving and when they retire.
This is where those criticizing Jeremy Siegel often get it wrong. The key to understanding his analysis is that he's only concerned with long, long periods of time. Asked about stocks' recent lost decade, he notes that average annual returns since 1991 have actually been quite good. Ten-year periods aren't of much interest to him. They're too short.
"Stocks go back and forth, back and forth," he says. "The past decade has been frustrating. But that's only because we had unreasonably high returns in the 1990s. The last 10 years has just offset the previous decade."
Siegel is especially bullish on stocks today because he thinks valuations are extraordinarily low. Stocks now trade at a price-to-earnings ratio of 11.5, compared with a historic average of closer to 19 when interest rates are this low. Analysts expect the S&P 500 to earn $112 next year, putting stocks at just over 10 times forward earnings.
Now, most investors think the $112 figure is far too high, and will come down -- a reason many use to justify being bearish on stocks. Siegel actually agrees. "I don't believe the number. I think it will come down," he says. But that's fine. Even if earnings fall 25% from current levels, stocks would still sell at a P/E ratio close to their long-term average. If earnings stay at current levels forever, stocks would still be a great buy, Siegel says. "You don't need growth to justify these numbers," he says. "And if we actually earn $112 next year? Oh, god. It's a bonus. You'll see stocks up 30% or 40%."
The amount of pessimism in today's market is totally overdone, he says. "It's one of the most bearish forecasts I've ever seen." Bond giant PIMCO has a gloomy theory called the "new normal," which forecasts real economic growth of 1%-2% going forward, compared with 3%-4% in the past. At the same time, gauges of economic growth expectations, such as the yield on Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS, are now near zero percent. The market panic of the past few months has made even bearish analysts like PIMCO look cheery. "It's the ultimate sign of pessimism," he says.
What keeps Siegel bullish on the long term is a belief that what drives our economy over time is still alive and well. In the short run, economists focus on demand as the key economic driver. In the long run, the real fuel is productivity, or output per hour worked, and population growth. This is one of the least controversial theories in economics, but it, too, is prone to criticism when viewed over different time periods. Most economists are bearish on the economy right now because demand is low as consumers deleverage. Siegel agrees, but remains bullish on the long run for a simple reason: Productivity is not only increasing, but it's increasing at an accelerating rate as technology connects the world. When ideas build on top of other ideas, prosperity multiplies. "We've brought 2 or 3 billion people online sharing ideas," Siegel says. The impact that this has is astounding. People used to work full time just to feed and shelter themselves, he notes. Today, the average person in the developed world needs to work just an hour a day to support basic human needs. Productivity has dramatically increased the quality of life around the world, and there's little sign of it slowing down -- in the long run.
Still, there are legitimate critiques of Siegel's views that remain open to debate. Yale economist Robert Shiller -- a good friend and former classmate of Siegel's -- values stocks based on an average of the past 10 years' earnings, adjusted for inflation. He calls it the cyclically adjusted price-earnings ratio, or CAPE. Based on CAPE, stocks are currently fairly valued at best, if not overvalued.
Asked to defend his analysis against CAPE, Siegel's views turn fuzzy. "CAPE shows valuations to be quite high, but the source is purely the earnings collapse of 2008-2009, when financials had these enormous write-offs," that aren't indicative of corporate America's earnings power, he says. When I point out that Shiller and others (including our own Alex Dumortier) have shown that this isn't so clear -- even ignoring the earnings collapse of 2008-2009, CAPE doesn't move significantly, which is the point of using a 10-year average -- Siegel doesn't come up with much of a response, noting that the losses were spread out over several quarters.
He is equally incredulous of the idea that corporate profits are at a cyclical top as profit margins approach record highs. "Those profit margins are up because foreign sales make up a larger percentage of companies' business. And guess what? Foreign business generates higher profit margins because they have lower tax rates," he says, although foreign sales as a percentage of total S&P sales have actually declined since 2008. "Some say we're at the top of this boom. I just don't understand that. Have you looked around? What boom are they talking about? The recession just ended two years ago. Unemployment is still high. How can cyclically adjusted profits be at a cyclical high?"
He then says something that catches my attention: "Forget the numbers. Go back to the logic of it all," he says. This was an interesting turn. The same Siegel who an hour earlier asked us to ignore our feelings about stocks and look at the data was now asking us to ignore the data and look at our feelings.
It is moments like this, I believe, that cause Siegel to face criticism. His work is valuable, persuasive, and intriguing. But it's very specific to the long run. Those critical of his work often ignore this, and it appears Siegel may forget it at times, too. The truth is, short-term profit peaks or 10-year earnings multiples aren't that relevant to his findings. Almost any critique thrown at Siegel can be properly defended with the words, "That shouldn't matter to investors with a long-term time horizon." Ironically, the beauty of Siegel's work is the idea that the short-term market fluctuations his critics obsess over set the stage for the long-term returns he emphasizes. "Fluctuations unnerve investors," he says. "Why? Because people can't stand them in the short run. Volatility scares enough people out of the market to generate superior returns for those who stay in." In that sense, those critical of Siegel's work are often actively proving its validity.
What might change Siegel's mind? Another uncontrolled collapse of the financial system, similar to what happened in 2008, could set the global economy back in a big way.
Will that happen, someone asks?
"Stay tuned," he says.
************************************************************

Wednesday, August 3

Half of children's bank accounts offer less than 1%

Children’s Bank accounts are a rip off. See here.

Which? Money found that half of children's easy access savings accounts offer a measly 1% AER or less,

One, First Trust Banks Junior Saver account, offered a return of just 0.05% just one tenth of the Bank of England base rate.

That's just 50p pocket money for every £1,000 saved.

And what happens when this kind of return is offered?

It's not the tax free limits, but the poor rates of return on offer that are a topic of conversation on the Mumsnet forum.

''Even with budgets so tight, parents do want to teach children value of savings," said Mumsnet chief executive Justine Roberts.

"They may have very small amounts of money, perhaps its birthday money or money from their grandparents, but the rates don't incentivise them to save at all.''

I agree, we closed our bank accounts for the kids and then moved all that money into ISA’s for them. Stock and Shares ISA’s to be precise. Nothing wrong in getting the little they store in their bank accounts moved into more productive ways of investment and buy shares, investment trusts, ETF’s etc. all in a nice little tax efficient shelter. Anybody who has put their kids’ money in a savings account is literally giving up a huge amount of upside on their children’s future. So never put the money in a savings account. The only reason might be for very young kids who are interested to see a passbook and understand the increase in savings. But even that? dont do it, just get them into share ownership as soon as they are able. My son did that from 12 years of age. I am going to try to do that with Diya from next year when she turns 8. Lets see if that works out.

Sunday, July 31

10 Reasons You Aren't Rich

Not a millionaire by a long shot, but here’s a good set of checks to see what you do. So I decided to apply that to myself.

10. You Care What Your Neighbors Think
No, not really. Sod them. I have a decade old car now, works for me. Don't need to show off. Live in a middle class house in a middle class suburb. The day the neighbours pay my bills is when I will be caring about what they think :p
9. You Aren't Patient
No credit card debt. At all. That’s moron business. We are also trying to pay off our mortgage debt asap but that takes time. 
8. You Have Bad Habits
I had a very bad habit of smoking. For many many years I smoked going back to when I was 18 and only stopped smoking at 40. Assuming that the cost of a pack was say £2 on average and I was smoking 1 pack a day, that sums up to £16,000 or $24.5k or Rupees 11.56lakhs. Now imagine that, that is really horrible. Let this be a lesson to you guys, don't waste money on shitty things like this. Now whiskey is a different matter. I also have another bad habit, but i think its an educational investment. I put aside £50 per year to plonk on the lottery. The numbers are picked by the kids. Its a fun thing. No?
7. You Have No Goals
It was difficult in the beginning. Didn't really have a goal per se. Its only when we had kids that we started to worry about having a financial goal and plan. Even then, it was simply to pay off the mortgage debt and save. Its slowly that we built up a plan, got financial and tax advice and then build up a proper plan for retirement, sickness and accidents, unemployment, mortgage, children’s education, their potential business investments, etc. etc. 
6. You Haven't Prepared
Yes, hopefully we are prepared. Perhaps overprepared, heh, I told my wife that that I am worth more dead than alive at this moment, lol.
5. You Try to Make a Quick Buck
Quick bucks come with quick losses. Usually. Its just stupid, this push to get quick money. Yes, once in a while you can do that, but generally no.
4. You Rely on Others to Take Care of Your Money
I used to, and then figured out, what the heck? Why am I paying others to look after my money? they take the returns out of my capital or returns and frankly I can do much better than them. Ever since I took control over my investments, i think I am doing 6-8 times better than those so called professional money managers.
3. You Invest in Things You Don't Understand
My dad didn't invest in stocks and shares. He said that he didn't understand it. And this is from a man who has 18 degrees in engineering. I can understand his point, he was happy and content in his financial mental health. While I did quibble and tell him to invest, he didn't want to. But that’s fine. And good. And beneficial. If you don't understand it, don't invest in it. Warren Buffet does that as well.
2. You're Financially Afraid
Then again, this is the flip side of the above. But as I said, i am ok with this. Its better to save the capital and even have a bit of a dip due to inflation rather than invest in something that you don't understand and lose the lot.
1. You Ignore Your Finances

Well, no, don't do that.

So all in all, the self check ticked most of the boxes, but i do regret many things. Nobody taught me personal financial management which is why I am so heavily involved in charities which try to educate kids on personal financial management and am pushing my children to work more on this. So I think I missed out on couple of decades of investments and better returns which I could have done earlier. I spent a shedload of money on stupid things. But hopefully better late than never and if that helps people to realise this, better it is.