Showing posts with label Charities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charities. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 1

Enactus in the National Finals

Is very chuffed that two of my universities where I am the Business Advisor have gotten into the Enactus National Competitions. LSE and Bedfordshire. I was informed about this yesterday and I am looking forward to coaching them through the competition. And hopefully one of them will go forward to the International Competition.

Its truly humbling to see these very passionate and committed students learning about capitalism, entrepreneurship, economics, management to transform lives and shape a more sustainable world. Truly amazing to see how we harness the power and make things happen. 5-6 years now and every year, these students make a giant amount of difference to the homeless, the students, the poor, the mentally ill, or what have you.

What’s Enactus? I quote

 

Enactus is an international non-profit organization that brings together student, academic and business leaders who are committed to using the power of entrepreneurial action to improve the quality of life and standard of living for people in need. Guided by academic advisors and business experts, the student leaders of Enactus create and implement community empowerment projects around the globe. The experience not only transforms lives, it helps students develop the kind of talent and perspective that are essential to leadership in an ever-more complicated and challenging world.

Our Commitment

Together we pledge to take action. Together we commit to apply our passions and talents and ideas to impact as many lives as we can. Not to hand out help to people in need, but to work side-by-side with them to create opportunity. So every person and community we touch is empowered to live up to their fullest potential.

Thursday, February 12

Food stamps put Rhode Island town on monthly boom-and-bust cycle

Kids


Yesterday I was chairing the finance committee at a charity. Which is an animal shelter. We help abandoned and abused animals, train vet surgeons etc etc. Very nice place.

But one of the things that we were talking about was how do we help our staff members. The basic problem is that people cannot survive in London on minimum wages. At about £15000 per year, after taxes, it's impossible to live. Their money runs out about the 22nd of every month. And then it becomes a nightmare. Like it's described here in the article.

Kids, being poor is very bad. Having had gone through this, it's soul destroying. Specially if you have children. Yes you may ask why have children when you're poor and cannot afford them but human nature and sex does that. Be that as it may, the human behaviour of people changes when they are poor. Very differently kids.
But we've got to help them kids. That's the mark of civilised people that we help others who are unfortunately in a worse situation than us.

London is more expensive than rest of the country so minimum wage doesn't work. So we are going to pay our staff at minimum wage an increase to what's called as a living wage. It will impact our delivery. It's a difficult decision as every pound we spend on staff has to be taken away from an animal. But it has to be done. We have to think holistically. Animals wouldn't be treated well if we have an underpaid hungry staff member. Yes. Hunger happens here in the uk kids. You've never experienced it and I promise you never will as long as I am alive but it's a very corrosive feeling.

Read this article kids. And think about how you can help the more unfortunate members in our society. And what can we do as citizens to make sure that we avoid this problem in the first place.

Love

Baba

http://m.washingtonpost.com/national/food-stamps-put-rhode-island-town-on-monthly-boom-and-bust-cycle/2013/03/16/08ace07c-8ce1-11e2-b63f-f53fb9f2fcb4_print.html

WOONSOCKET, R.I. – The economy of Woonsocket was about to stir to life. Delivery trucks were moving down river roads, and stores were extending their hours. The bus company was warning riders to anticipate “heavy traffic.” A community bank, soon to experience a surge in deposits, was rolling a message across its electronic marquee on the night of Feb. 28: “Happy shopping! Enjoy the 1st.”

In the heart of downtown, Miguel Pichardo, 53, watched three trucks jockey for position at the loading dock of his family-run International Meat Market. For most of the month, his business operated as a humble milk-and-eggs corner store, but now 3,000 pounds of product were scheduled for delivery in the next few hours. He wiped the front counter and smoothed the edges of a sign posted near his register. “Yes! We take Food Stamps, SNAP, EBT!”

“Today, we fill the store up with everything,” he said. “Tomorrow, we sell it all.”

At precisely one second after midnight, on March 1, Woonsocket would experience its monthly financial windfall — nearly $2 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps. Federal money would be electronically transferred to the broke residents of a nearly bankrupt town, where it would flow first into grocery stores and then on to food companies, employees and banks, beginning the monthly cycle that has helped Woonsocket survive.

Three years into an economic recovery, this is the lasting scar of collapse: a federal program that began as a last resort for a few million hungry people has grown into an economic lifeline for entire towns. Spending on SNAP has doubled in the past four years and tripled in the past decade, surpassing $78 billion last year. A record 47 million Americans receive the benefit — including 13,752 in Woonsocket, one-third of the town’s population, where the first of each month now reveals twin shortcomings of the U.S. economy:

So many people are forced to rely on government support.

The government is forced to support so many people.

Sunday, November 30

Hunger Feeds More The Hungry: Evidence On Cognitive And Affective Empathy

a rather interesting paper here…

We investigate experimentally the impact of cognitive and affective empathy on behavior. A
novelty of the study is that we do so directly without invoking responses to questionnaires, but
by manipulating the state of hunger of participants in the single-shot Dictator game during
the holy month of Ramadan. Our sample consists of male workers in the Sepaahaan (car
battery) manufacturing factory in the city of Isfahan in Iran. We find that, only, affective
empathy amplifies altruistic behavior. More specifically, hungry dictators transfer more money
to hungry recipients than fed dictators. The difference is statistically as well as economically
significant.

and there’s a great quote from the old master, Adam Smith. I quote:

How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his
nature which interest him in the fortune of others and render their happiness necessary
to him through he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it.
Adam Smith

the use of hunger during the Ramadan time is quite interesting. Despite them being hungry, the donors will pay more in an altruistic manner. The fact that they are hungry themselves attenuates their unselfish behaviour, good to be human, eh?

Tuesday, November 26

Three essays on the economics of gender, health and happiness.

Kannu

you don't have to read the full dissertation, but at least check out the first chapter. It is a fascinating study in the field of happiness and economics. As you know, one of the objectives of life is to be happy so there is a burgeoning body of research which is analysing this area.

the first one was about headscarfs, i don't understand this but then who does….there are strange reasons given to cover your head and wear ties, but as long as its done voluntarily, who cares? but in this case, the Ataturkian militantly secular state bans headscarfs in public institutions. Result? women are statistically significantly unable to work as well as they could, hence they stay at home and pump out more babies resulting in more babies being brought up by women in veils. If the idea was to reduce the number of religious people, it fell foul of the law of unintended circumstances. As a libertarian, you will appreciate this, eh?

the second one was interesting, as you know, in our family we have a tradition of donating our bodies to medicine and organs for transplants. Your great uncle did so, Dadu and Didu have written so in their wills, while your parents have organ donor cards. This is informed consent, son. But where this happens, the rate of organ donation is very low. But where there’s presumed consent, like in Belgium, where bodies are taken assuming consent has been given, the donation rates are double or triple. Excellent news, eh? the nudge theory, son. This is why you need to be very careful about what questions and public policy angles you take. Its like the question, “when did you stop beating up your dog” and you can only answer yes or no. stiffed. in some cases, it works like in pension provision. Everybody knows that you should save for your pension, but hardly anybody saves. Read the HSBC report I linked into. But there is a difference, if you have presumed consent and force everybody to store and save before your salary lands in your bank account, then automatic savings happen.

And finally the question of charity. As you know, I do loads of this stuff and yes, I feel good, so its not purely altruistic. The lady in question has found evidence for this. But yes, that makes me happy. Doing stuff for others, son, makes you feel good, really really good. So I felt so proud when you were teaching your friend. Seriously proud. I know you are getting a reputation of a good friend and somebody who is always willing to help others. Keep it up, son, it helps to be happy with helping others.

If you were a libertarian, then each of these cases will challenge your thinking and enforce your principles even better. It’s the gray areas where the principles are tested, son. Religion, personal aspects, etc. etc. Fascinating area to keep thinking and challenging one self.

Love

Baba

 

 

    1. From headscarves to donation: Three essays on the economics of gender, health and happiness.

Date:

2013

By:

Ugur, Z.B. (Tilburg University)

URL:

http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ner:tilbur:urn:nbn:nl:ui:12-5927864&r=hap

Abstract: Zeynep’s research interests are mainly in the field of health and labor economics. In this thesis, she explores a broad range of topics within the domain of the economics of gender, health and happiness. The first chapter provides the motivations for the studies and summarizes the main findings. The second chapter documents differences in educational attainment, labor market outcomes and childbearing among women by their use of headscarves and investigates the impact of the headscarf ban in Turkey on women’s educational attainment, labor force participation and childbearing decisions. In Chapter 3, she explores the relationship between presumed consent legislation and various organ donation indicators such as willingness to donate one’s organs, organ donation card holding, actual organ donation rates and kidney transplantation rates. The last chapter looks at the relationship between pro-social behavior and subjective wellbeing and tries to quantify the happiness effect of donating in the Netherlands.

Monday, November 7

His Libraries, 12,000 So Far, Change Lives

Now this is a man to emulate. What a man! what a hero.

ONE of the legendary triumphs of philanthropy was Andrew Carnegie’s construction of more than 2,500 libraries around the world. It’s renowned as a stimulus to learning that can never be matched — except that, numerically, it has already been surpassed several times over by an American man you’ve probably never heard of.

I came here to Vietnam to see John Wood hand out his 10 millionth book at a library that his team founded in this village in the Mekong Delta — as hundreds of local children cheered and embraced the books he brought as if they were the rarest of treasures. Wood’s charity, Room to Read, has opened 12,000 of these libraries around the world, along with 1,500 schools.

Yes, you read that right. He has opened nearly five times as many libraries as Carnegie, even if his are mostly single-room affairs that look nothing like the grand Carnegie libraries. Room to Read is one of America’s fastest-growing charities and is now opening new libraries at an astonishing clip of six a day. In contrast, McDonald’s opens one new outlet every 1.08 days.

It all began in 1998 when Wood, then a Microsoft marketing director, chanced upon a remote school in Nepal serving 450 children. Only one problem: It had no books to speak of.

Wood blithely offered to help and eventually delivered a mountain of books by a caravan of donkeys. The local children were deliriously happy, and Wood said he felt such exhilaration that he quit Microsoft, left his live-in girlfriend (who pretty much thought he had gone insane), and founded Room to Read in 2000.

He faced one challenge after another, not only in opening libraries but also in filling them with books that kids would want to read.

“There are no books for kids in some languages, so we had to become a self-publisher,” Wood explains. “We’re trying to find the Dr. Seuss of Cambodia.” Room to Read has, so far, published 591 titles in languages including Khmer, Nepalese, Zulu, Lao, Xhosa, Chhattisgarhi, Tharu, Tsonga, Garhwali and Bundeli.

It also supports 13,500 impoverished girls who might otherwise drop out of school. In a remote nook of the Mekong Delta, reachable only by boat, I met one of these girls, a 10th grader named Le Thi My Duyen. Her family, displaced by flooding, lives in a shabby tent on a dike.

When Duyen was in seventh grade, she dropped out of school to help her family out. “I thought education was not so necessary for girls,” Duyen recalled.

Room to Read’s outreach workers trekked to her home and cajoled the family to send her back to class. They paid her school fees, bought her school uniforms and offered to put her up in a dormitory so that she wouldn’t have to commute two hours each way to school by boat and bicycle.

Now Duyen is back, a star in her class — and aiming for the moon.

“I would like to go to university,” she confessed, shyly.

The cost per girl for this program is $250 annually. To provide perspective, Kim Kardashian’s wedding is said to have cost $10 million; that sum could have supported an additional 40,000 girls in Room to Read.

So many American efforts to influence foreign countries have misfired — not least here in Vietnam a generation ago. We launch missiles, dispatch troops, rent foreign puppets and spend billions without accomplishing much. In contrast, schooling is cheap and revolutionary. The more money we spend on schools today, the less we’ll have to spend on missiles tomorrow.

Wood, 47, is tireless, enthusiastic and emotional: a motivational speaker with no off button. He teared up as girls described how Room to Read had transformed their lives.

“If you can change a girl’s life forever, and the cost is so low, then why are there so many girls still out of school?” he mused.

The humanitarian world is mostly awful at messaging, and Room to Read’s success is partly a result of his professional background in marketing. Wood wrote a terrific book, “Leaving Microsoft to Change the World,” to spread the word, and Room to Read now has fund-raising chapters in 53 cities around the world.

He also runs Room to Read with an aggressive businesslike efficiency that he learned at Microsoft, attacking illiteracy as if it were Netscape. He tells supporters that they aren’t donating to charity but making an investment: Where can you get more bang for the buck than starting a library for $5,000?

“I get frustrated that there are 793 million illiterate people, when the solution is so inexpensive,” Wood told me outside one of his libraries in the Mekong. “If we provide this, it’s no guarantee that every child will take advantage of it. But if we don’t provide it, we pretty much guarantee that we perpetuate poverty.”

“In 20 years,” Wood told me, “I’d like to have 100,000 libraries, reaching 50 million kids. Our 50-year goal is to reverse the notion that any child can be told ‘you were born in the wrong place at the wrong time and so you will not get educated.’ That idea belongs on the scrapheap of human history.”

But I am afraid in the western world, this is what is already happening with libraries closing left right and centre.

Saturday, January 1

More rip off merchants masquerading as charities

So now Sir Stephen Bubb says that bank bonuses should be taxed and proceeds given to charities. Oh! very nice of you, mate. Next idea presumably would be to force people to grow green hair? Or how about forcing people to pay £1 every time they have a McDonald burger? How about forcing people to pay £1 every time they switch on their tv’s? Or every time they fill up their tanks with petrol?

Taxes are compulsory, mate, you pay them so that there is a state which looks after basic needs. Charity, on the other hand, is voluntary. This basic idea seems to have passed you by, you fascist ignoramus. Why call yourself as a charity if your funding is based upon government levied taxes? Shame, this is so highly illiberal. The story also says, and I quote:

Last month, a survey by the Charity Finance Directors Group, consultants PWC and the Institute of Fundraising, found that a third of charities nationally that receive state cash say they will have to reduce the level of services they provide. More than a quarter expect to make staff redundant and the charity thinktank New Philanthropy Capital estimated that the voluntary sector's income from state sources could shrink by between £3bn and £5bn as a result of the cuts.

Assuming that the reduction is about 25% (same scale of normal government cuts), this tells me that this forcible contribution via taxes to the charity sector is to the range of £15bn and £20bn. That is about 10-13% of the annual income tax take by the government. What the hell? We pay £43bn in yearly interest costs, there’s a place where you can spend this £20 billion in charity funding. What on earth is this stupid thing? Go see the fakecharities.org site. Here’s a great example:

An independent employment charity which works nationally with the long-term unemployed, helping people overcome personal barriers so that they can move into long-term, sustainable jobs. Our objective is to help those who are furthest from the labour market to get and keep a job, by preparing them for work and supporting them through their individual return-to-work programmes.

Very good stuff, its good to hear that private citizens are putting their money to help their fellow citizens get back to work. No? no!

The Charity’s accounts for the financial year ending 31 March 2009 show an income of £7,981,260 and expenditure of £7,620,171. The charity’s income includes £6,717,834 funding from regional Government Offices, local authorities and the London Development Agency.

You are welcome. The mind boggles. Here is an example of what local council’s fund out of your council tax and general taxation.

image

Why are we funding Irish in Greenwich or a Somali Lunch Club? Or a swimming club? Good lord.

Thursday, December 30

Amusing take on U2 and Africa

From here. I quote:

An expert commission of African leaders today announced their plan for comprehensive reform of music band U2. Saying that U2’s rock had lost touch with its African roots, the commission called for urgent measures to halt U2’s slide towards impending crisis.

“Our youth today are imperiled by low quality music,” said Commission chairman Nelson Mandela. “We will be lending African musicians to U2 to try to refurbish their sound to satisfy the urgent and growing needs for diversionary entertainment at a time of crisis in the global music and financial sectors.”

Concerns about U2 have been growing in Africa for a while. One Western aid blogger testified to the Commission that his teenage kids found U2’s music “cheesy.” The Mandela Commission proposed that U2 follow a series of steps to recover its Edge:

1) Hire African consultants to analyze U2’s “poverty of music trap”

2) Prepare a Band-owned and Commission-approved Comprehensive U2 Reform Strategy Design (CURSD)

3) Undertake a rehabilitation tour of African capitals to field-test and ground-truth proposed reforms

4) Subject all songs to randomized experiments in which the effect on wellbeing of control and treatment groups is rigorously assessed.

Mandela expressed optimism that the Commission’s report and proposed reforms had come in time to stave off terminal crisis in U2, and restore its effectiveness in the 80s arena rock field.

Friday, April 9

Plagiarism – I got ripped off

You might recall this article which I wrote on a charity that I am working with in India/Bhopal. Its about abandoned, orphaned kids getting a fresh start. This was published on my blog on June 29th 2008, on Chowk on June 30th, 2008, on Desicritics on June 28th, 2008 and on Boloji.com on June 29th, 2008.

Strangely enough, somebody sent me a link today about this. I am pasting screenshots:

image

image

Notice no attribution, no nothing. Somebody called as Er. Snigddha Aggarwal seems to have lifted the entire article wholesale and posted it on her blog on November 29th 2008. This was posted by her on a blog run by Avinash, who is a Project Engineer with ONGC. I could not find an email for Ms. Aggarwal so sent the following email to Avinash.

 

Hello there Avinash

This is with reference to an article posted by Er. Snigddha Aggarwal on your blogsite.

http://delhiwithavinash.blogspot.com/2008/11/we-can-make-difference.html

There is no attribution to the fact that this was written by myself.

this article was written by me at http://piquancy.blogspot.com/2008/06/we-can-make-difference.html which I wrote on a charity that I am working with in India/Bhopal. This was published on my <a href="http://piquancy.blogspot.com/2008/06/we-can-make-difference.html">blog</a> on June 29th 2008, on <a href="http://www.chowk.com/articles/we-can-make-a-difference-bhaskar-dasgupta.htm">Chowk</a> on June 30th, 2008, on <a href="http://desicritics.org/2008/06/28/124212.php">Desicritics</a> on June 28th, 2008 and on <a href="http://www.boloji.com/ramblings/184.htm">Boloji</a>.com on June 29th, 2008. </p>

To say that I am disappointed would be the least of the statements. This is for a charity for homeless, abandoned, orphaned and abused kids. Somebody left a comment asking for details on how to help the charity. Needless to say, as this was not written by this Er. Snigddha Aggarwal, she would not have been able to assist in giving help to the poor orphans of Bhopal. Now THAT was cruel.  What I found seriously hypocritical is that while she was fulminating against Islamic terrorism, she was happily stopping help to poor orphaned Indian kids. Anyway, that's water under the bridge, she has to live with this on her conscience.

This article on your blog was brought to my attention by somebody who was looking to help Bhopal Orphans.

But that's not the problem. I am also not concerned with the copyright issue. If you do want to keep that article up on your blog, could you please add in a link to me or my blog so that any volunteers could contact me like the above lady and we can actually make a difference? I could not find an email for Ms. Snigddha Aggarwal hence am sending this note to you.

Thanks, Avinash, and would appreciate a response on this.

Sincerely

bd

Bhaskar Dasgupta

I know this sounds very self righteous, but I have seen the eyes of those orphans. Feeling very pissed about this entire thing. Lets see what I hear back.

UPDATE 9 April 2010.

This is the original email I received:

From: XXX [mailto:XXX@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 April 2010 06:42
To: bdasgupta@gmail.com
Subject: Request for info on the shelter for abandoned kids in bhopal

Hi Mr Dasgupta,
Found
your post on abandoned kids in Bhopal to be really inspiring -- I'm all excited to pitch in too! However, I cannot find the email ID / phone number of people in charge of running this institution. Could you pls pass me those details ?
Ah, one more thing..I'm not not really sure if you allowed this post to be reproduced under different names (without attribution to the original). Here is a link you might wish to check :
http://delhiwithavinash.blogspot.com/2008/11/we-can-make-difference.html  ( I found this while googling for contact details of Ms Deepika Suri ! )
Apart from the issue of blatant copy of your text, I am afraid that less informed people would not be able to do justice to the queries about this. In the same post above there is someone like me who is wanting to help out, but the author obviously has no clue and I see no public response either.
Anyway, kudos for championing the cause of these homeless kids ! I hope I can make a difference to their life too..
Regards,

But no response to the email to the blog owner, so I filed a DCMA complaint with Google who replied back today morning:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blogger Help [mailto:support@blogger.com]
> Sent: 09 April 2010 00:39
> To: bdasgupta@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [#626597190] Blogger Complaint
>
> Hello,
>
> We have received your DMCA take-down notice on
>
http://delhiwithavinash.blogspot.com/2008/11/we-can-make-diffe
rence.htmlm
> dated 4/7/10 and have reviewed the allegedly infringing
> content in question. In accordance with our policies, we have
> taken the content offline and notified the blogger of the
> complaint. Should the content reappear at this post with the
> infringing content included, please let us know and we will
> take further action.
>
> Sincerely,
> The Blogger Team

Good, case closed.

Tuesday, November 24

Is 35% a fair amount for charities admin cost?

No. I dont think so at all. For those who are tempted to give money to Oxfam, Christian Aid, Or the British Red Cross, know that more than 30 pence in the pound goes to non project expenses. Quite a high administrative expenditure there...

 

This is indeed very high compared to many other charities. I am a trustee of a charity and if I found that my CEO and her staff spent any of this % amount, I would be firing her immediately. While the charity where I am does not do anything of the level of fund raising which these charities are engaged in, but still, this is shocking.

Any why on earth is the government giving money to charities? Are they charities or are they Quango’s? or arms of the government? This is frankly stupid to use my tax monies to fund charities.

Sunday, September 30

Light the fire in children's minds!

I was informed by my little princess (3 Years old!) that she wants to be a doctor. My son (12 years old) is vacillating between being a stockbroker or a software developer. His hero is Bill Gates. My firm belief is that children have to be encouraged to reach for the start.

Here is an op-ed by Sir Peter Lampl, founder and chairman of the Sutton Trust (an educational charity). He is complaining about the low aspirational levels by many students and that is a sheer waste of talent. I quote:

While others are tempted to pin the blame on biased universities, I believe there is something more deep-rooted at work – a culture of low aspirations shared not just by students, but in many cases by their parents and teachers, too. There are many excellent teachers doing their best for the students, but it is a disturbing fact that some bright pupils are actively discouraged from reaching for the top.

It is worse, read on

You might think the classroom would act as a corrective. But all too often low expectations are reinforced by our socially selective school system.
The Sutton Trust has surveyed 20% of the teachers in state schools who advise students on university – and more than 80% of them said they thought their pupils would find it difficult to fit into the top universities, particularly Oxbridge.
Hard-pressed teachers face many other pressures and in some cases lack the confidence and know-how. Parents, meanwhile, are frustrated. Some even tell of instances where their children have been told not to bother applying

to Oxford or Cambridge, despite being qualified.

Why are teachers telling their students that they cannot aim high? How DARE THEY? I wrote earlier about how important it is for children to aim high as they might end up the lowest of the low. Teachers have to fire up their children's imagination and aspirations. Make them reach for the stars, push them to excel themselves. Make them realise that they can do better than they think.

I am truly sickened by this waste of talent.

Technorati Tags: , ,