Sunday, May 11

Nothing will happen in Burma, AGAIN

Remember what I said before about Burma? I said that nobody will help them in their fight against the military goons, only they themselves can. And now, the military is not helping and actively stopping people from helping the cyclone victims. And still the Burmese do not do anything. And here's a prediction, nothing will actually happen again, anything between quarter of a million to a million Burmese will die and still nothing will happen.

All the liberal and conservative hand wringing around the globe is just hot air, nothing, absolutely nothing will happen. China, India, South East Asia, EU, USA, Arab World, OIC, United Nations, nothing, nobody can help on this. Here's a suggestion to the Burmese people, rise and fight for your freedom. Otherwise you will die. Mind you, you are dying anyway, so what do you have to lose?

Technorati Tags:

Tibet has a better case for independence than Kosovo

Now this should put the cat amongst the pigeons, lol, I warned about this. The EU and USA's frankly stupid foreign policy will get it into major hypocritical and stupid situations. So, the writer, Paul Harris, is a barrister and was founding chairman of Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor and he wrote this article. I quote:

Does Tibet have a right to self-determination under international law? There are strong legal grounds to show that it does and that this right is being denied by China. As the recent protests in Tibet and the disruptions to the Olympic torch relay have demonstrated, Tibet is an international problem crying out for a solution.

Tibet’s status has been given renewed topicality by the recent independence of Kosovo which has so far been recognised by 40 countries, including all of the Group of Seven leading industrialised nations. If Kosovo has a right to self-determination, the right of Tibet is infinitely stronger. The catalogue of gross oppression, the second-class citizen status of Tibetans under Chinese rule and identity of Tibet as a country are all much clearer than in Kosovo’s case.

Hehehe, fun times ahead...

Beef with BA

This was funny to read. I wouldn't take the fun away from you, but go read it yourself. Given the fact that I will be flying around like an idiot starting from next weekend (off to sunny Malaysia), I will be be happy with my beef while shedding a tear for the rest..., hehehe

 

Technorati Tags: ,

Hindu Rage Boys put in place

I really loved this story. Remember what I said before on this? Rage Boys are funny chaps and they are sort of found all over the world. But these guys being Hindu guys, they are obviously close to my heart..

I quote from what the judgement said:

A painter has his own perspective of looking at things and it cannot be the basis of initiating criminal proceedings against him," Kaul said in his 74-page judgement. "In India, new puritanism is being carried out in the name of cultural purity and a host of ignorant people are vandalizing art and pushing us towards a pre-renaissance era," he observed.

The complainants are from Bhopal, Indore and Rajkot (two of those cities are my home towns, which just goes to show how much moronic behaviour has descended on these Hindu rage boys...). Typical stupid behaviour. But then, for those who want to see some kind of polity based upon religion, read this, you turn moralistic and people will laugh at your stupidity. You see, people who bang on about morals are usually immoral themselves. Without exception. I have yet to find one of those foaming puranitical mental morons being god like or being the poster boys for morality. Funny, how amusing.

Hindu Rage Boys put in place

I really loved this story. Remember what I said before on this? Rage Boys are funny chaps and they are sort of found all over the world. But these guys being Hindu guys, they are obviously close to my heart..

I quote from what the judgement said:

A painter has his own perspective of looking at things and it cannot be the basis of initiating criminal proceedings against him," Kaul said in his 74-page judgement. "In India, new puritanism is being carried out in the name of cultural purity and a host of ignorant people are vandalizing art and pushing us towards a pre-renaissance era," he observed.

The complainants are from Bhopal, Indore and Rajkot (two of those cities are my home towns, which just goes to show how much moronic behaviour has descended on these Hindu rage boys...). Typical stupid behaviour. But then, for those who want to see some kind of polity based upon religion, read this, you turn moralistic and people will laugh at your stupidity. You see, people who bang on about morals are usually immoral themselves. Without exception. I have yet to find one of those foaming puranitical mental morons being god like or being the poster boys for morality. Funny, how amusing.

Games earn more than movies

When a computer game ends up taking more than the double of the first week's takings of any movie, then you need to wonder what's happening to the world's idea of entertainment. I quote:

Grand Theft Auto IV, the latest instalment of the video game franchise published by Take-Two, racked up sales of $500m this week after seven days on release – more than double the record weekly take for any movie. Rival Activision had exceptional results on Thursday, with sales of Call of Duty 4 pushing profits well above estimates. While music companies and movie studios grapple with piracy, games publishers are in a sweet spot. It is much harder to copy software for the new generation of consoles. New instalments in a games franchise tend to be a technological and an artistic leap forward. On a cost-per-hour basis, a $60 game may be better value than a $20 CD. And, unlike the “dream factory” movie studios of the 1930s, there is no risk stars will defect to a rival producer or, even more inconveniently, die.

I keep on speaking at various conferences and with senior people and the fact that they are missing what's happening at the bottom is frankly frightening. Do you know that most of the 18-25 year olds, the feedstock of our future business, work and society spends way longer online than watching tv or films?

Do you know that the youth of today do not know how to value their online work any more because of rampant copying of films and music? I was at a board meeting recently and one of the board members (he has a private equity background) was talking about how people have no idea about how much to ask for, what's the funding requirement, etc. etc. They have no idea how to determine what costs are and what to charge for. I had to add to that, in my experience and what i have been seeing in banking and hearing, people who are coming into work have no idea about Intellectual Property and how to price it.

You are a spotty young chap, sitting in a dark bedroom, spending your time online. You get fed and watered. Then online, somebody asks you to code something, or translate something, or use your avatar to man a info stand on Second Life. These boys cannot make the link between the effort expended online, the time spend on the effort and the value of that. Also, how much should they ask for to simply exist.

Look at the numbers above, this weird economy is now in such a state that these spotty youths are spending more money on a game than a film!. Wake up folks, the world is changing under our eyes.

The economics of a university

Universities are very complicated beasts to run. Just how complicated came to me when I attended a board meeting of a university business school today. I finally managed to get a bit of a picture of the financial's which underlie a university's operations and many things became clearer to me.
You know I keep on moaning (see links here) about student fees and how universities have to be properly funded and so on and so forth, so this note will give you a bit more detail on how that works.

Also, please understand that this model has some peculiar British characteristics. My other experiences with and knowledge of universities in India, Australia, New Zealand, France, Belgium, USA, Canada, Sweden, Netherlands and Ireland unfortunately has led me to believe that every country has a different way of funding its universities. But, if you are a typical average university (if such a beast exists...), you will be spending money on the following main things

  • Buildings, estate, campus and their maintenance
  • Salaries and other expenses of current salaries
  • The huge and gigantic overhang of pensions to be paid for the    ex-employees of the universities, all of whom are on final salary pensions
  • The consumables (chemicals, paper, pens, computers, and so on and so forth)
  • Library and laboratories and stuff that goes into them (equipment, books, etc. etc.)
  • Other bits which come in are like advertising, marketing, public relations, local taxes (while they are charities and generally tax exempt, they still get hit by taxes),
  • services such as electricity, water, sewage, etc.
  • Depreciation and other financial treatments such as fines, penalties, provisions, reserves, tax, etc. etc.

So add it all up and very simplistically speaking, that's your cost of running the university (I am sure I have missed out on many things here...), feel free to add them here. So where do they get the money from? Well, they get the money from the following places

  • The government grant per student which is embarrassingly minute compared to the economic cost
  • The fees that are paid for by the Home / EU student (roughly 3k per year for undergraduate students, can be very high for say business masters students )
  • The fees that are paid for by non EU students (roughly anything between 2-5 times the home fees depending upon the course, level and university) (see this for a giggle)
  • The consultancy fees that professors get in
  • Research grants from government and industry bodies
  • The rental amount or some other amount from external institutions which are based on campus or use univ facilities for academic and research purposes
  • The professional education and post experience fees for company specific programmes
  • Some other blobs of dosh which local, regional, national or EU governments might give out in return for training long term unemployed people for example.
  • Outsourcing revenue, so they outsource a canteen to company XYZ, the company pays a rent / amount to the univ, same with running hostels, etc.

As you can appreciate, the British government is cutting costs rapidly and the grants from the government is rapidly reducing. The main cash cow are international students and postgraduate students. So if an undergraduate student is paying 10k per year, that's just about perhaps paying for his education, a bit of a domestic student and an even smaller bit of a staff member.

As I keep on saying, there is nothing free in the world. So if you do not want to pay for your fees, somebody else has to pay. Its either the shareholder, taxpayer, citizen, myself or my (grand) children. If you jack up the fees too high, then the international student can simply go to Ireland or USA or Australia. Then you are stiffed because he has not only walked away with his fees, he has also walked away with a potential future investor in Britain... If you want more research money, then you have to hire more qualified staff. Who will pay for them? How about getting industry grants? In this day and age of recession? What about government grants? Well, government is trying to get its spending under control. Why?
because if it doesn't, then it has to raise taxes and raising taxes in the middle of a recession is very bad. More importantly, companies and high earners can move countries very easily. I can nip over to Ireland and work from there very nicely, for a equal if not better quality of life and keep on doing the same job (ish)... or go to Switzerland..., So they cannot raise their taxes that easily. Lets not forget that these universities are having to pay for pensions for a very long period in time, and that's very expensive...

So, I am simply not surprised that the chancellors are screaming for more money, they simply cannot afford to educated unfunded students. So what do they do? They simply close down unremunerative departments which do not bring in extra money such as geography, physics, and other departments.
Smaller universities or universities which cannot compete on research therefore go for the volume business. Get more students in, and since their revenue is dependent upon simply number of students, out come courses like film studies or surfing management. Cheap staff, cheap to teach (the sea is free and you don't have to pay for film tickets) and bob's your uncle.

There are a huge number of politicians and ministries studies and committees and groups and industry bodies and and and who have worked on this before, and the current situation is the sum result of all those deliberations. I don't have an answer but I know this. To improve the current situation will require God, Allah, Ganesh, Zeus, Imhotep and Walt Disney, till then, I will keep on wondering how on earth do we finance a university.

BJP complaining about morals?

This made me giggle like mad. This is a Hindu right wing party, ok? And it is stuffed full of people whose morality (relating to murder, tolerance, love, fairness, consistency...) is rather suspicious (mind you, most Indian political parties are like this).

So when they start complaining about the dress code of cheerleaders at cricket matches, I just think, oh! you idiots, you just proved yourself to be utter morons. I mean, just who comes up with these ideas? Do they not have any brains?

So, this chap, BJP's state president Bandaru Dattatreya, is clearly somebody who is hypocritical. It is clear that he is more interested in the political posturing rather than actually working towards the improvement of women. I googled his statements and frankly, nothing much. What's his point? What has he done to improve the lot of women? How about this? He has basically and very explicitly pandered to woman's glorification by fielding a film actress in elections. If he had done it on the basis of having more women on his party list, I would have said fine, he is a women's right's defender, but as usual, he is a hypocrite, moaning about cheerleader's dresses while being a total cynical git.

He complains about corruption, but what has he actually done against corruption when he was in power? Again, happy to hear if he has actively kicked out somebody for corruption. How about this case? How about this complaint? How about him associating with shady characters? And this huge defender of women's rights refuses to let women join his organisation while moaning about women's rights.  See what I mean by being a hypocrite and a utter blot? Disgusting, but actually very amusing. Now what happens? Every time he gets on his high horse and talks about morals, I will chuckle at this man who is speaking out of his... As for his knowledge of Hinduism, that's another chuckling matter.

Nobel win in 2007 a 'bloody disaster': Doris Lessing

How amusing and so cute. 

London : Nobel Prize-winning author Doris Lessing has said that winning the award for literature in 1997 has been a "bloody disaster", reports said Sunday.

"All I do is give interviews and spend time being photographed," Lessing said during a BBC radio interview to be broadcast Monday.

Lessing, 88, said that she has been constantly in demand since her win last October and that her writing had stopped as she didn't "have any energy any more".

Technorati Tags: ,,

Pakistan finally belling the cat?

You cannot violate the laws of economics for too long. The giant sucking sound that the Pakistani Army makes when it is the parasite on the Pakistani State, People and rest of the world seems to be diminishing by a small amount. I quote;

Pakistan’s new coalition government has ordered a “massive cut” in budget expenditure across the board, including military spending, to cope with the rising cost of fuel and food subsidies

How much do you want to bet that nothing will be cut on the military expenditures and the brunt of the spending cuts will fall, as usual, on the poor disenfranchised Pakistani citizen? But, the fact that a finance minister had the temerity to say this (well, he said this in London, another sad fact, I rather doubt that he would have had the gumption to say this in Isloo).

See some of my previous essays. Here and here.

Still lets see...